Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
How things change - Then and now.
Newbury.net - A Community website for Newbury, Berkshire, UK    The Newbury of Yesteryear    Old Photographs of Newbury  ›  How things change - Then and now.
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 4 Guests

How things change - Then and now.  This thread currently has 1,256 views. Print
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Administrator
June 14, 2009, 10:36am Report to Moderator
Administrator Group
Posts: 858
Posts Per Day: 0.78
14th October 1972


14th June 2009


Logged Offline
Private Message
Brewmaster
June 15, 2009, 10:26am Report to Moderator

Posts: 159
Posts Per Day: 0.15
I'm not sure what you are trying to prove here.

Most times the ring road has much more traffic on it than in the 1972 photo.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 14
78
June 15, 2009, 10:38am Report to Moderator
Guest User
I don't think there anything being 'proved' other than the changes in the images. -
Logged
Reply: 2 - 14
Jerry_Cornelius
June 15, 2009, 10:42am Report to Moderator

Posts: 10
Posts Per Day: 0.01
I don't think Admin is trying to 'prove' anything. The view today looks rather better than it did back in the 70s when, as I recall from visits at the time, Newbury was a bit of a dump.  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 14
massifheed
June 15, 2009, 11:20am Report to Moderator

Posts: 396
Posts Per Day: 0.36
Quoted from Jerry_Cornelius
The view today looks rather better than it did back in the 70s when, as I recall from visits at the time, Newbury was a bit of a dump.  


The double level Sainsbury's car park is a shame though. I went there for the first time on saturday since they put it up, and I couldn't beleive what an oppresive looking structure it is.

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 14
Jerry_Cornelius
June 15, 2009, 11:41am Report to Moderator

Posts: 10
Posts Per Day: 0.01
Each to their own, Massif.  If i were to stand anywhere near Sainsbury's looking for a nice view, the main obstacle to my viewing pleasure would be this http://www.flickr.com/photos/nige4president/2223777530/ monstrosity.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 14
Administrator
June 15, 2009, 11:55am Report to Moderator
Administrator Group
Posts: 858
Posts Per Day: 0.78
Quoted from Brewmaster
I'm not sure what you are trying to prove here.

Most times the ring road has much more traffic on it than in the 1972 photo.


It was just a continuation of our series of old photographs, this time, I decided to incorporate a 2009 photograph to indicate just how much things have changed in just under 40 years.

Lets start you off with a few of the changes that you may not have noticed.
Winchcombe Road (Right hand side of picture) - The houses have been demolished and the site along with the road itself have been swallowed up in the Sainsbury's Supermarket completed in 1994. (Presumably Council Tax payers were compensated for the loss of the Road with a handsome 106 contribution)
Another wing has been built on the Telephone Exchange.
Traffic lights have been added to the roundabout (paid for by Sainsbury's in 1994)
The Borough Arms has been demolished and replaced by Thomas Eggar.
The Police Station has had another floor added.
The Library has been built in the Wharf.
The trees have grown a bit over the years.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 6 - 14
Reynard
June 15, 2009, 12:34pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 31
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Quoted from Administrator
I decided to incorporate a 2009 photograph to indicate just how much things have changed in just under 40 years.


Standard of service has dropped from West Berkshire Council. It doesn't look as if those white lines have been repainted since 1972.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 14
Muddler
June 15, 2009, 12:36pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 496
Gender: Male
Posts Per Day: 0.45
Location: Cartergrad 2025
This reminds me of one of my points in the earlier discussions on why the Vision is rubbish.

All railings could be painted in Newbury blue and would look much better. It's only because of maintenance costs that they're not.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 8 - 14
massifheed
June 15, 2009, 3:06pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 396
Posts Per Day: 0.36
Quoted from Jerry_Cornelius
Each to their own, Massif.  If i were to stand anywhere near Sainsbury's looking for a nice view, the main obstacle to my viewing pleasure would be this http://www.flickr.com/photos/nige4president/2223777530/ monstrosity.


Agreed, but the BT exchange is already in place, so there's not much we can do about that easily, whereas planners have an option of whether to allow further ugly structures to be allowed to be built or not. When there is a planning outcry over illuminated shop signs, but seemingly not regarding huge car park extensions, I'm not sure how they can come to the decision to allow it. I'm not suggesting any foul play as such, but just because an area isn't particularly pretty in the first place, doesn't mean that people should be allowed to keep building crap looking buildings there.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 14
massifheed
June 15, 2009, 3:08pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 396
Posts Per Day: 0.36
Quoted from Reynard


Standard of service has dropped from West Berkshire Council. It doesn't look as if those white lines have been repainted since 1972.


Apart from the fact that the lines in the '72 picture are longer. Maybe they've worn at the ends to the length they are now.  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 14
Muddler
June 15, 2009, 3:38pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 496
Gender: Male
Posts Per Day: 0.45
Location: Cartergrad 2025
Quoted from massifheed


Agreed, but the BT exchange is already in place, so there's not much we can do about that easily, whereas planners have an option of whether to allow further ugly structures to be allowed to be built or not. When there is a planning outcry over illuminated shop signs, but seemingly not regarding huge car park extensions, I'm not sure how they can come to the decision to allow it. I'm not suggesting any foul play as such, but just because an area isn't particularly pretty in the first place, doesn't mean that people should be allowed to keep building crap looking buildings there.


Wait until you see the 7 storey hotel go up next to the A339. In Park Way, the block of flats is as tall as BT Tower. And as for BT Tower itself, Cartergrad's state architect has plans to replace it with......a tower block of flats. The Sainsburys car park will fit in very well in time.




Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 14
spartacus
June 15, 2009, 6:52pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 327
Posts Per Day: 0.30
Quoted from Muddler
All railings could be painted in Newbury blue and would look much better.
Like painting the kerbstones in certain parts of Northern Ireland to indicate whether you're in a unionist or republican area you mean? Instead of red, white & blue or Irish tricolour, we'll have our street furniture painted in Tory Blue (with a few hundred litres of 'long-life' orange kept in the paint store in case the LibDems get back in..... no need to bother stocking up on Labour Red paint round these parts mind  )

Would be a bit of a Forth Rail Bridge job for some poor sod with a paint brush though wouldn't it?....  

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 14
blackdog
June 15, 2009, 7:42pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 1,321
Posts Per Day: 1.20
Quoted from Administrator
Lets start you off with a few of the changes that you may not have noticed.


The most obvious change (apart from the loss of what was left of Winchcombe Road) is the development on Chivers' yard (the triangle between Carnegie Rd, Cheap St and the A339).
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 14
Nobby
June 15, 2009, 8:19pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 630
Gender: Male
Posts Per Day: 0.58
Location: Newbury
Quoted from Reynard


Standard of service has dropped from West Berkshire Council. It doesn't look as if those white lines have been repainted since 1972.


We now await the correction from User23

Standards have not dropped at WBC as WBC were not in existence in 1972! Besides WBC don't have standards!
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 14
1 Pages 1 Recommend Thread
Print